Canada has officially ended its automatic 10-year multiple-entry visa program, marking a significant change in the country’s immigration policies. Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) announced the decision on November 6, emphasizing that such visas are “no longer considered to be the standard document.” The move aims to strengthen national security and improve the scrutiny of individual visa applications.
Under the previous system, the 10-year multiple-entry visa allowed travelers from specific countries to visit Canada multiple times over a decade for short stays without reapplying for a visa. This program was especially popular among business professionals, families, and immigrants visiting relatives.
Now, visitors must apply for a visa tailored to the specific purpose of their travel, and each application will be assessed individually. IRCC explained that the policy shift is designed to prevent potential misuse of visas, such as overstaying or engaging in unauthorized activities.
While the change may seem like a setback for frequent travelers who relied on the convenience of the 10-year visa, IRCC assured that those who follow immigration rules will still be able to visit Canada without difficulty.
The new policy does not affect permanent residents or Canadian citizens, who retain their re-entry privileges. However, immigrants who require visas for travel will need to adjust to the revised application process. Travelers are encouraged to plan ahead, as visa processing times may increase due to heightened scrutiny.
This decision reflects broader efforts by Canada to tighten immigration controls, address security concerns and adapt to evolving visitor profiles.
Source: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
Contact Marjorie at [email protected]
A word of caution: You should not act or rely on the information provided in this column. It is not a legal advice. To ensure your interests are protected, retain, or formally seek advice from a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) in good standing of CICC. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of RCIC’s.
